The post that started it all #1 | To the mayoral hopefuls from the NYC Democratic Party : Your shenanigans are hurting New York

I published this diary at DailyKos on May 2nd.

http://www.dailykos.com/diary_edit/2005/5/3/0647/99136

This came out of my frustration with, especially, Fernando Ferrer's Amadou Diallo fiasco. I will be posting about not just Ferrer, but the inability of politicians to articulate their opinions for the sake of politics. For now, this is one of two articles I am reposting for the site's historical records.

May 2

The race for the Democratic nomination for NYC Mayor is a mess. I am thisclose of just throwing the towel and endorsing Bloomberg.

Monday's editorial cartoon at the Daily News best encapsulates it perfectly: The unrecognizable faces Freddy Ferrer, Virginia Fields, Anthony Weiner and Gifford Miller appear on the sides of milk cartons with the headers "Missing", ""Have you seen me?", "Have you heard of me", and "Who cares?", respectively.

2006democrats_for_nyc_mayor.jpg

Call them the faulty foursome : They're bumbling, they're quarreling, they have no message and no real appeal. In other words, Democrats, we're losing New York City again to the Republicans for a total of 12 years in a row.

These Democrats need to get their act together and fast! There's two there that should get out of the way of the real contenders. Their presence is nothing but wedge politics. If they were really committed to getting Democrats back into power they'd remove themselves this instant. There's only two contenders in that bunch --and no, I'm leaving it up to you to guess who I am talking about

So here's a memo to the Democratic hopefuls for mayor : Get your act together, now!

As a Puerto Rican blatinamericana, self-employed homeschooling mother of two these are the three main issues I want to all the candidates for mayor of New York City to address :

1. This household needs medical insurance. $1000 a month for my family is unacceptable when, as two self-employed web development professionals, we can barely pay the rent and sock away the 40% NYC, NY State and the IRS eat away yearly from our household income. We need help with medical insurance and we need it now.

We do not own a "weekend" home. We do not own a car. I am still paying  off student loans. And with our high tech work, we are barely making it. How can you even start to address poverty in NYC when you wont address how "the barely making it" middle class is hurting?

swelf-sufficiency_standard_2004.jpg

Yes, we are two adults, one preschooler and one schooler and, yes, we come close to the $78K a year of the study says is the bare minimum for a family of four to be self-sufficient in the "south" of Manhattan. And you know what. Because we are self-employed, and pay up the wazoo in taxes (maybe more than Donal Trump percentage-wise) we can't afford medical insurance. The Self-Sufficiency Standard for the City of New York study fits my husband and myself to the tee.

Fellow Democrats as long as my husband and I cannot afford medical insurance, people like us will never be self-sufficient.  It just takes one ailment, one injury, to ruin financially a family in our position.

Stop pandering to the unions and start paying more attention to the independent workers, self-employed, temps and consultants that litter this city. We go to the polls, we are voters too. You need to talk to use, blog to us, on a daily basis.

2. I want a mayor that will fight to make it easier for parents to parent and to be 100% involved in their children's education.

I am the freak in the playground that homeschools her kids. So I am a magnate for education queries, comments, rants and cries of woe. I cannot tell you how many friends and neighbors say "I'd homeschool if it were easier for me to ..." and what usually follows is a littany of complaints that have little to do with their ability to raise and educate their own children and all to do with lack of community support structures.

Where are the community centers in NYC? Where are the indoor commons that would make meeting other homeschoolers easier during the harsh winter months? Where are our free or discounted homeschooler metrocards?

For all parents raising kids in the city, where's our tax break for education related expenses? The joke of public school education here in NYC is that they have the cheapest tuition in town. Tuition at a secular private school in New York City costs $15,000 per kid annually, on average. So it is with no qualms that the better public schools unleash the PTAs to do the dirty work for them and demand from incoming families for annual contributions that run as much $500 per child --and that is outside of the often imposed fundraising scattered throughout the school year.

Here are people paying some of the highest city and state taxes in the nation and we still have to fork over after-tax money for public education? And that is not counting the compulsory education requirements like Physical Education and Secondary languages the schools have pushed to after-school programs to force parents into funding them.

Homeschoolers get a double whammy. Even though by law homeschooling is supposed to be a private education choice, the state has made it onerous beyond belief for homeschooling parents, forcing us to fill out a sea of paperwork and to follow regulations that are applied to public school students but not to those who go private school. Homeschoolers get all the hassles of public schools, all the expenses of private school and at a greater cost because there are no secular, independent learning centers in New York City. If there were, believe me, the crunch for public & private schools in NYC would be cured in a heart beat.

Which takes me to a topic near and dear my heart : When, oh when, is there going to be serious talk about part-time public education in NYC? Maine has it, Alaska has it. Even California, with its independent study centers has it. When are we really going to sit down and talk about all the progressive alternatives already in place in other states that would greatly help parents best use resources the blood, sweat and tears of their taxes already buys for public education? When are we really going to deal with actual education reform in this city and look at part-time education as a workable alternative to our education crisis?

3. I want a pledge to bring back citizenship to the NYC political landscape. I want more people like me in the process and less professional politicos --whether they are called "civil rights leaders", "borough presidents", "lobbyists" or "union leaders".

I want a mayor that responds directly to constituents and not to special interests, not to political consultants, not to big donors. I want someone who will think outside of the box and instead of wasting billions of dollars in a stadium that will not bring me any tax relief, health insurance relief or better education options in the city, I want to see the new mayor really build a communications network across the city; to better connect neighbors within their communities and find immediate solutions for each and every city block; each and every outer borough neighborhood.

For that matter, I want to see technology being tapped and used for building better networks across neighborhoods in NYC. I want to see free WiFi, I want an open source 311 --so creative alternatives to community networking can be developed and implemented.

You may think of us as household of extremists : We are self-employed. We educate our children ourselves. But if y'all came and hung out with us for a couple of days, you'd see that we actually represent your real-life "white collar" workers who make up the bulk of voters in New York City.

We work hard. We care for our children. We know our neighbors young and old. My husband follows politics on the sidelines. I'm all about political action. We cover a lot of the political bases here. He's white. I'm mulata. Our kids are somewhere in between. We cover quite a few demographics here.

So I hope these Democratic mayoral hopefuls get their act together. I'm thisclose to endorsing Bloomberg and if I'm thinking about it, believe me there's a lot of people in our neighborhood and our work, education and social networks who are thinking exactly the same.

So what would you like these four candidates talk about?


http://dailygotham.com/blog/blogdiva/the_post_that_started_it_all_1_to_the_mayoral_hopefuls_from_the_nyc_democratic_party_your_shenanigans_are_hurting_
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
0
About author n/a
Liza Sabater's picture



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mole333's picture

Well....

By now I have heard three of the four Dem candidates, and heard two of them more than once. I think there is no question that so far they have failed to spark much interest among New Yorkers. There is a big problem there. But, I do not see them as having no message. In fact I have rather liked the message of at least two of them...more than liked, I have thought they kicked ass and one of them I found extremely inspiring all three times I have heard him.

What is going wrong? Part of is politics is still very racial in NYC. Each candidate has a huge uphill battle getting even noticed outside his or her particular cultural group. It takes a real orator and some connections within different communities to get your message out there. All of the Dem candidates have alot going for them, but none is a great orator, and connections aren't being made.

Part of it is in some ways that at least two of the candidates may be running TOO MUCH on message alone and not enough on charisma. They are appealing mostly to our reason and not enough to our heart. I am personally very attracted to a good message and that is why I like two of the candidates a great deal...not just as being better than Bloomberg, but being excellent in and of themselves.

Part of the problem is the same things Democrats do almost every election at all levels--exactly what this diary is doing (no offence!) Whether or not an analysis of this kind is right or wrong, Democrats spend more time dissing ourselves than in dissing the opposition. Republicans rarely do that! Instead they hammer away at their message more or less in unison. I do not advocate that kind of blindness, but I do advocate a more positive attitude among ourselves. It is true that some candidates don't deserve our support (and this time I am not referring to the mayors race, but Zell Miller comes to mind...). But I have found in many elections going all the way back to Mondale that a really excellent, intelligent, caring, visionary candidate will be put down by his own party as not being good enough. I have found that since the media doesn't do a good job of presenting candidates, I have to find out what a candidate is like. Often when I do I am impressed and I find it hard to believe why so few Democrats see what a good candidate the person is. To use Mondale again, did anyone talk about how he led the Civil Rights movement in Congress? Did anyone talk about his instrumental role in the Camp David talks? Did anyone talk about how he had been called the "strongest vice President this nation has ever had" and it wasn't meant as damning with faint praise? No! Everyone just picked up the media line that he was boring.

Al Gore also suffered both from his handlers and from the fact that few even in his own party bothered looking beyond the image the media portrayed. Yet I think he would have been among the best, most environmentally aware and active presidents we have ever had.

I don't know what to say to help change this image that the Dem candidates are somehow incompetant or lack a message. I don't think that is true at all. THey have failed to connect with the people. I see that. In some cases I think that is personality. Ferrer comes off condescending, even though I think he has alot going for him as well. In other cases I think it is harder to understand. Miller really impressed me as having a message, in some detail. And he is out there among the people in a way that the other candidates haven't been.

I think you are right that some if not all of the mayoral hopefuls need to get their act together. But I have begun to think that the voters have to get their act together as well because nationwide for decades now voters have passed over superb candidates for dingbats like Reagan and Bush and Bloomberg who are much, MUCH more removed from the world of the common American, yet manage to use the media and their connections better to get elected. Few candidates seem to combine BOTH the skills it takes to get elected with the skills it takes to kick ass in the position they are running for. Looking at the Brooklyn DA race, the best connected candidates (Hynes and Sampson) and the most charismatic candidate to reform-minded folks (Peters) are lousy candidates since they are, respectively, absent, corrupt and too slick and green. The two best candidates I know of, who actually have the skills, passion and vision to be superb, honest DAs (Kriss and Wooten) are being largely ignored by the voters, so they can't get the money to put up a good fight. It is sad! And it is something I am finding very frustrating as someone who is fighting hard to get the really good people (rather than simply the most electable people) elected.

Democrats spent a great deal of time dissing Mondale, Kerry, Dean and Gore, yet the bottom line is they were all superb leaders who would have been far better presidents than those they ran against. It is good that we have high standards for our politicians, but are we killing ourselves because we sometimes can't see that a candidate does meet our high standards?

The mayoral candidates DO need to get their acts together. But so do we because without enthusiasm from us, they have no chance and we are left with Bush, Pataki, Bloomberg...and a whole line of truely horrible people who don't come anywhere near the high standards we set.


Not yet rated.
our gal in brooklyn's picture

organize organize organize

wow a lot of interesting stuff got raised here.
however as a non-unionized allegedly "freelance" worker I have to argue that "pandering" to the unions isn't the problem--- pandering to the bosses is!!!!
What freelancers like us need is a union. (and godbless the freelancers union but its not a real union yet-- its just a membership organization. the one that gives me health care, yes but it doesn't give us collective bargaining power---- yet)

If broadway/nightclub musicians, actors, film techies, and guys in the building trades can be in unions there is no reason that consultants like us can't.
When we have unions we will have collective bargaining power too. We will have someone else paying for our health insurance and we will be able to prove what a badass constituency we can be. Politicians will have to face up to our interests and show up at rallies about our issues.

we should support unions and support the unionization of a wider field of workers.

There are ways to deal with the intricacies of union membership among freelance populations but other fields have done it.

white collar workers deserve unions too- especially now that we have zero job stability and are forced to pay our own damn social security taxes like i did last year.

i'd like to hear others thoughts on this issue-- its sort of my mission.


Not yet rated.

Current weather

NY - New York City, Central Park

Clear sky
  • Clear sky
  • Temperature: 69.8 °F
  • Wind: Variable, 6.9 mph
  • Pressure: 29.89 inHg
  • Rel. Humidity: 73%
  • Visibility: 10 miles
Reported on:
3 July 2009 - 11:51pm

src='http://www.culturekitchenmedia.com/ads/adview.php?what=zone:4&n=ada096da' border='0' alt=''>








Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available


User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz


Quotes 2

With all the people AG Spitzer screwed in the business community - entire industries - can't you imagine a groundswell of folks out there eager to see him pay for his crimes?


— Michael Caputo on The Daily Gotham