Some election observations

It's really tempting to offer the other side some payback for their crowing in 2004 – all that drivel about 'the Democratic Party is dying' and all that. If ever there was a time for gloating, today would be it; but the results speak for themselves, I think.
First, the good news: Democrats took back the House with a convincing margin, gained four seats in the Senate, and lead in two Senate races that are presently too close to call. To get an idea of the magnitude of yesterday's earthquake, consider this: for the first time in American history, a political party lost no seats it was defending. Ain't never happened in 230 years, folks.
Oh, and say hello to Governor Spitzer, elected with 69% of the vote. Rick Santorum no longer blights the United States Senate. Ohio is now a blue state. John Sweeney, Sue Kelly, Nancy Johnson - gone. Congressman Arcuri has a nice ring to it as well.
Less glamorous, but perhaps more important: Democrats took the majority of state legislatures and six governorships.
Other notable results:
South Dakota voters rejected the state's draconian abortion ban, says Reuters. More losses on marriage equality, of course, but the first win, in Arizona.
Richard Pombo appears to be going down in flames, 53% to 47%.
Steve Harrison outperformed Frank Barbaro in NY-13, according to the New York Sun. That makes Harrison the natural choice to run again in 2008. The money is out there.
NY-29 remains too close to call, with Kuhl declaring victory and Massa refusing to concede.
The greens failed yet again to make their unique combination of socialism, snootery and finger-pointing attractive to more than 50,000 voters. Sorry, asshats, no ballot line for you - enjoy petitioning.
Now, the really bad news: Jimmy Dahroug lost to incumbent Caesar Trunzo in the Third Senatorial District, says Newsday. Andrea Stewart-Cousins has a narrow lead over Nick Spano, reports the Journal-News. Brian Keeler went down to defeat in the 41st District, as did Brooke Ellison.
Just as example of how avoidable this outcome was: Serph Maltese held his seat by less than 1,000 votes against a gentleman I've never heard of. The DSCC needs a swift kick in the ass, frankly. For people involved in the effort to retake the state Senate, as I have been for over a year, these results are not surprising. Infuriating, yes, unacceptable, yes, but not surprising.
And so it goes. The Democratic Party won a historic victory yesterday, but now needs to demonstrate that it can govern. Here in New York, we now face the challenge of reforming the most dysfunctional state government in the nation. In Washington, we'll be treated to the return of checks and balances.
2006 Elections
Yes and no
Agree on the necesssity of oversight and investigation, but if we spend the next two years on a partisan jihad, we're no better than them. We have a real chance to forge a broad new majority, but the way to do that is to pass legislation and present a real alternative to the other side. In short, again, I'm more interested in expanding our new majority than in payback.
Its not just payback
Its not just payback though. George W. Bush has made a mockery of the separation of powers that are supposed to be Constitutionally protected. If the House doesn't investigate these abuses and have extensive hearings, it will only encourage further abuses in the future. So its not just payback.
Bear in mind too...
Bear in mind too that Bush is going to veto almost any legislation the Congress passes, and the Democrats don't have near the votes to override anything. So like it or not, except maybe for something like immigration reform, there is going to be two years of gridlock. Which makes it all the more important for Pelosi and co. to use these two years to spell out the abuses of the Bush administration. Coalition building can come later, we need to finish this battle first, and that comes in two years by taking back the White House. We must have a single minded focus on that goal. Spending two years coalition building and making Bush look like a moderate will not accomplish that goal.

2 thoughts
Steve Harrison got 2 more percentage points against Vito Fossella than Frank Barbaro in 2004, but given the anti-Republican sentiment that swept the country this year, it's hard to argue that Harrison did better than Barbaro and that he's the natural choice to run again in 2008. The fact is, Harrison was the Democratic nominee because the Dems could not find anyone else to run. I seem to recall Harrison running for City Council in his home neighborhood (in Brooklyn) and finishing last in a five-way race. That would suggest there might be stronger Democratic candidates out there.
Also, it's too early to say definitively that the Dems lost no seats they were defending. Georgia-12 is still undecided.















great news for this country
This is great news for this country. Nancy Pelosi is going to use her new power to spend the next two years in an intensive investigation of the Bush Administration's abuses of power both in terms of the Iraq war and overextension of executive privilege in the war on terror. Impeachment proceedings might well be in order, and the GOP can't complain, since they were the ones who impeached Clinton over FAR less serious matters.
But more importantly, the message has been sent to Bush: "End this war in Iraq or in two years the american public is going to end it for you!" This war has already sunk the republican party's power in congress, and it will sink the gop's power in the white house. Unless they wise up and end it. The american public, even evangelicals and conservatives, are tired of our soldiers coming home in body bags, giving their lives to fight another country's civil war.
Finally, after January I guess New Democratic Majority can change its name. I mean the New Democratic Majority is here and it won't be new after that
I say NDM next year should drop the "New" from its name and become CDM-- CITIZENS OF THE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY! 