Times-Union covers Silver primary
There's a thoroughly remarkable piece in today's Albany Times-Union that New Yorkers interested in the reform of our notoriously un-small-D-democratic state government should read.
When Paul Newell and Luke Henry were toddlers just learning to talk 31 years ago, a young trial lawyer from the Lower East Side of Manhattan named Sheldon Silver was cutting his political teeth as a freshman assemblyman.
This year, Newell and Henry are challenging Assembly Speaker Silver, now one of state government's three most powerful politicians. It marks the first time in more than two decades that Silver has faced opposition in a primary.
Beautiful, but here's the real meat:
While Newell and Henry admit they're at a financial disadvantage, they think there's a desire for change in the district that will benefit them.
"I feel like change is in the air," Henry said. "I feel like I'm part of a citizenry that is saying to ourselves that we need more from our government, and we actually have the means to effect it."
Both argue Silver has been in Albany too long. They say he's lost touch with his electorate.
Newell believes the Legislature needs a 12-year term limit. This would give legislators enough time to develop expertise but not enough to become entrenched, he said.
Nothing, one can imagine, sends as chilly an air of discomfort through the enbalming chamber that is the state legislature than that horrific idea of term limits, implying as it does that seats in that body should not be lifetime sinecures. Blasphemy.
The Henry/Newell challenges are an undiluted good thing for the State of New York. This for several reasons, the first of which is that primaries are in themselves a good thing. We're seeing from the contested Democratic Presidential primary that contests, especially unexpected ones, do wonders for defining and growing the party. The second is simply that, in a system that lets legislators draw their own districts, in very concrete terms, it is not the case that the people choose their representative. The representative chooses the people.
The third is that this primary will inevitably lead to a broader discussion we need to have, not dedicated to a horserace - "Ooh, Hillary's up two points in Ohio!" - but to the issue of Sheldon Silver's performance for his district and this state. And there is no better time to have that discussion than in a campaign season transformed by the electorate's hunger for change.
More and better Democrats, please.
On the web: Paul Newell for Assembly
(h/t: Gatemouth)
2008 Elections | Albany Reform | New York State Assembly | Paul Newell | Sheldon Silver

Two Better than one?
1) If the goal is generating a higher combined vote against Silver than Jacoby is correct. If the goal is beating him, he is wrong. Silver has a strong base vote; dividing the voters outside that base, even if one expands the pie, is just not conducive to victory. In addition, challengers and their volunteers are a lot more motivated if they have a possibilty of tasting victory.
More and better Democrats is not necessarily what one wants in a primary against the Speaker
2) A challenge to Silver in Albany may not be a bad thing, but remember, the last guy who tried it was a DINO.All change is not change for the better, even when one is replacing a tumor upon the body politic.















Two challengers are better than one
Conventional wisdom is that if you want to knock off a power broker, you get behind one effort and back it to the hilt. By that reasoning, having both Newell and Henry run against Silver is a bad idea.
The term "conventional widsom" was coined by John Kenneth Galbraith in order to point out how often it's wrong.
In this case, having two people challenge Silver will be far more effective -- if they make sure not to bump heads. If their campaigns work together, they will do far better than either one could do alone, even with the other's support.
Chances are, Silver will get a majority in September. But if the combined total of both challengers exceeds 40% , it will serve as a major wake-up call. Then they Newell and Henry can get together and talk about 2010. Meanwhile, there will be rumblings in the Assembly about replacing Silver as Speaker.
And wouldn't that be interesting!