Welcome!

Please Login/Register with us to post unmoderated comments, blogs and events. We are a community site open to all.

NYCHA's Phony Fiscal Crisis

my work area

Navigation

| | | |
Rating

No! I don't mean NYCHA is not broke but ...New York City’s Housing Authority (NYCHA) has been and is being mugged and robbed by Federal, State and City Republicans. NYCHA operates more than 2600 buildings with more than 180,000 apartments and many more than 400,000 residents. (It does a lot more, but for purposes of this post and the next, I focus only on its role as housing operator) As a result of planned policies federal, state and local subsidies for NYCHA have declined dramatically over the Bush, Pataki, Giuliani and Bloomberg years. As a result, cash for routine maintenance is drained away, fees and rents have increased and surprisingly, NYC continues, vampire-like, to suck hundreds of millions of dollars a year from NYCHA. (See the figures after the jump)

NYCHA’s GOP government-induced financial crisis was the subject of a fascinating forum a few days ago at the New School's Center for NYC Affairs. There Daily News columnist and editorial board member and former NYCHA resident Errol Lewis convened a panel of experts and officials and an audience of alarmed tenants and activists. The tales they told, the problems they debated and recent developments point to a NYCHA crisis which could, if not addressed, severely damage the largest single bloc of affordable housing in NYC – some of it imposed by Mayor Bloomberg right this minute.(Check out the forum here)

Public housing in NYC has for the longest time been housing for lower income workers. Under the Reagan administration, rules were revised which forced many workers out of NYCHA apartments. By raising the maximum rent from 25% of net income to 30% of gross, thousands left NYCHA because 1980s stabilized rents were lower. They were replaced by extremely poor families. (My Council-Member Rosie Mendez’s family moved in this period) The Reagan view was that NYCHA’s housing should be reserved only for the poorest and homeless. The instability and turnover this engendered in NYCHA communities has been partly reversed by a policy which encourages some balance between working and extremely low-income families. Is it too appalling to underscore the divisions this brings out between the advocates for homeless people (Mary Brosnahan , recently criticizd NYCHA’s failure to make more of its vacant apartments available to homeless families.) People who want to get into public housing get on a list and, like in the movie Casablanca, they, wait and wait and wait. Unless an applicant has a “priority” (domestic abuse victim, for example) the standard wait for a NYCHA apartment is 10 years, I am told by people who work with NYCHA residents and those seeking to move in (With an emergency priority, some get an apartment in as little as one year – essentially they jump the line, making everyone else’s wait longer.). One consequence of the appallingly long wait-lines is that people who are homeless move in with friends or family –doubling or tripling up. Joseph
Shuldiner, a former NYCHA General Manager guessed that the actual total of NYCHA residents could be as high as 550,000. The excess, underground population means NYCHA apartments get more than normal use and thus need more, not less maintenance.

Funding Is Failing. NYCHA has been funded partly by federal, state and city aid. Since George W. Bush’s first budget (FY 2002) in October of 2001, operating subsidies from the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development have not kept up with increasing costs -- $439 million has been lost in federal money. In 2007, the declining federal share of the subsidy amounted to $159 million less than had the subsidies been kept at their traditional rate. The gap may increase by $12 million more.

In 1998, thank you Governor Pataki, NYS eliminated $13 million for subsidies.

Mayors Mike and Rudy cut $25 million fro NYCHA begining in 2001.

That is a cumulative annual cut of $197 million in operating expenses. Do you wonder where the operating loss of $225 million per year comes from? Well, here is one very big answer but there is more.

NYC bleeds NYCHA for city services. NYCHA is an Authority, not precisely a NYC agency. Its board is named by the Mayor, its employees are effectively NYC employees but – unlike the NYC MTA (also an authority) it pays NYC hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Yearly, NYCHA pays, NYC millions

Taxes “payments in lieu of taxes” $27
Police (NYCHA had its own) $71
Department of the Aging $ 2.9
DEP (Water & Sewer) $84
Sanitation (Bulk Pick Up) $ 1
Office of Labor Relations $ 1
-------------------
$186 Million

Once upon a time, NYCHA was seen as a cash cow for NYC. Its direct HUD grants were drained off to cover NYC operating costs. Now that HUD grants have shrunk, NYC, with billions in surplus continues to bleed NYCHA. NYCHA is paying and paying while its own workforce is depleted, its ability to maintain and operate its apartments diminished and its tenants facing increased rents and fees.

Coming soon, I hope, proposals to sell off NYCHA properties and some suggested political solutions like electing a few more progressive Democrats.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Shari Chea's picture

Selling off NYCHA properties is NOT the solution!

My name is Shari Chea, I am a leader at Community Voices Heard and I have lived in New York City Public Housing for 43 years. Community Voices Heard is a grassroots organization that is organizing public housing residents to save and preserve public housing. I have watched the services in public housing go down steadily for the past 12 years or so. This article does a good job of explaining why services have been decreasing, the funding for NYCHA has been cut at the city, the state, and the federal levels.

This article says that NYC government has viewed NYCHA as a "cash cow" by taking money for services out of NYCHA's budget, 186 Million annually. The deficit NYCHA is facing is a result of NYC continuing to take this money out while the money is no longer being put in by all levels of government.

This is a broken system but it is not incapable of being repaired as the author of this article would have you believe. The government must re-establish funding to NYCHA and the city must find other ways to get the 186 million dollars.

Selling buildings will not provide housing for all those who are on the 10 year waiting list nor will it provide a solution to the 186 million dollars the city takes annually. With more than 400,000 residents in NYCHA, over 30,000 people living in shelters, untold numbers on the waiting list it is obvious that the need for public housing is larger than ever. Where are all these people supposed to go if they tear down public housing? There isn't enough room in the shelters and there isn't enough affordable housing available.

What we need is for NYCHA to be more efficient and better funded. We need MORE public housing so that we will be able to get people out of the shelters and into a stable home. We need more workers to make sure that public housing is safe and clean for the hardworking families that live there.

Selling NYCHA land is not the solution, public housing is an important part of this city and we need to make sure that it will be around for years to come. With rental prices reaching rates that are totally unafforable to low-income New Yorkers, NYCHA represents one of the last outposts of affordable housing in this city.

I applaud the author for his ability to accurately capture the issues surrounding NYCHA's budget, however I am surprised to see the solution he has come to is to support the selling of property. The facts are clear, NYCHA needs more government funding and the city needs to find a new "cash cow".

Daniel Millstone's picture

As it happens, Shari Chea, I agree that

selling NYCHA property is an especially bad idea. It was not mine -- but is it an idea which the federal government urges upon NYCHA and other housing authorities. When, Thursday I hope, I write more on the Milano-New School Conference, I'll tell more about what people are proposing for NYCHA and what I think we all might do to help.