Crowdsource Request : The Taxi Alliance Strike
A "crowdsource" request is more than a request for help. I am asking all of you who read this blog to put in a little bit of your knowledge of this situation in the comments as part of my research for this story.
What I need from all of you is to give me whatever information you have about the Taxi Alliance strike that is going on right now and that will continue until Friday morning (that's when the scheduled 48 hours of the strike will end).
I could actually write off-the-bat a littany of reasons why the GPS system that is being rammed down the throats of taxi drivers is a really bad idea --not just from an ethical standpoint but also from a legal one; especially if we are talking about how this would impact not just the civil rights of drivers but of passengers as well.
But the one sticking poing in this situation is the division between the two unions. On one end is the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, led by a woman called Bharavi Desai. On the other end is the opposing union, New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers, led by a Fernando Mateo.
I have spoken to Ms. Desai and have gotten background on their grievances. I have tried contacting Mr. Mateo to no avail.
This is what I am missing in this story :
Why would a union not only oppose the strike but go out of their way to smear their efforts if it is supposed to help all taxi drivers, not just the members of one union?
I really, really want to know what does Fernando Mateo get out of all of this?
Ok people, strart your research, rumors and gossip engines. I want everything you've got in the comments.
If perchance, you want to contact me directly, just ping editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com.
Thanks!
Digital Civil Rights | GPS | Indentured Servitude | Labor | Labor Law | Money | New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers | New York Taxi Workers Alliance | Privacy | Surveillance | Taxi and Limousine Commission | Technology | Unions | Bharavi Desai | Fernando Mateo

Trust me my fellow New
Trust me my fellow New Yorkers, because it seems that most are not connecting the dots these days, that "cost" will be passed onto us. Cab rides are high as it is.
I'm not saying that I think the monitors are a good thing, but as far as this point is concerned, the "cost" has already been passed on to us. The last taxi rate hike was approved specifically as part of a deal with the taxi owners to install the monitors. They've gotten their increased fares for over 6 months now (the increase was for the stated purpose of paying for the new equipment) and now they want to back out of their half of the bargain.
Personally, I'd rather have no monitors and the old, lower, fares, but I don't think that's an option.

taxi strike
just read Juan Gonzalez in todays Daily News-he lays out many things wrong with the GPS & puts Mateo in context
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/col/gonzalez/index.html

The Fernando Mateo's New
The Fernando Mateo's New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers is made up mostly of livery drivers and has a history of scabbing on strikes. During the TWU strike in December of 2005, Mateo geared up to take on more passengers while the Taxi Workers Alliance refused. Shows which side they're on.















Fernando "The Hustler" Mateo (nick name says it all)
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=Fernando+Mateo.&gwp=13
If you just read his bio and the list of the company he keeps, it's not a reach to say he's an opportunistic advocate for whomever is in charge. Lap dog comes to mind.
I've heard commentary that he also grossly exaggerates the number of drivers he represents.
As for your question regarding his role as a "union" personalty, look at what he says and you'll see his "union" persona is a scam at best. Mostly he says nothing but "there will be no strike" without citing any of the issues- he sounds like Mayor Bloomberg. I haven't heard him once discuss the concerns and there are very real concerns.
I don't know if anyone remembers how irritating those god awful recordings used to be. The ones with celebrity voice overs talking about seat belts. It was tortuous as a passenger. The driver had to hear that all day long.
Anyone that doesn't support the drivers should be ashamed of themselves, because this time it's worse for passengers. Bloomberg wants to install monitors to bombard you with commericials during your entire trip. Maybe if he was paying for my trip I'd consider it, but I'm paying and I just want to get there in peace. Also the monitrs heat up the seats for the driver - real nice in the NY summer. They also have to kick back to the credit card companies, they have to pay for the cost of the machine and their privacy is invaded to boot.
Trust me my fellow New Yorkers, because it seems that most are not connecting the dots these days, that "cost" will be passed onto us. Cab rides are high as it is. But like everything else Bloomberg's has done - it's double the cost for the same service, but add some insult for good measure- in this case non stop, in your face, commercials for the whole trip.
Oh and for those that are just longing to pay your cab fare with your credit card, yeah you the same one that debits a candy bar and ties up the whole line for ten minutes. I have no sympathy. If you HAVE to finance a cab ride, maybe you should think about the subway or get your mom to send you cash instead of filling your card.
-NY Native