Homeland Security to NYC: Screw You (NYC as Bait?)
On 9/11/2001 the consequences of ignoring the threat of al-Qaeda was driven home dramatically. America, NYC in particular, had the lesson slammed home on that day. President Clinton had warned us, Bush included, that al-Qaeda was the threat to watch. His warnings were ignored. We paid the price on 9/11.
But has the lesson been learned? Did the Bush administration realize that its agenda had to focus on defeating al-Qaeda? At first it seemed that they had. The invasion of Afghanistan and the toppling of the al-Qaeda-allied Taliban was clearly the right first step. I was heartened when Bush took that first step.
But then came Tora Bora. Bush abandoned the War Against Terrorism, pulled out a large chunk of our troops and let Osama bin Laden get away. Why? To invade Iraq, a nation that had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Bush let his attention wander from the war against those who attacked NYC and America. Bush dropped the ball.
As I have written recently, and perhaps at too great a length, that decision by Bush to abandon the real war in favor of his directionless war on Iraq has allowed al-Qaeda and the Taliban not only to regroup, but to expand. They are stronger than ever by our own admission. Bush dropped the ball and the enemy that attacked NYC and America is stronger than ever. Bush is losing the War Against Terrorism, just as he is losing his directionless war against Iraq, "Mission Accomplished" not withstanding. In fact, the Iraqis are taking Bush up on his offer and are "Bringing it on." And now we have even given al-Qaeda its long-desired foothold in Iraq.
Why is Bush losing? Why is he refusing to learn the clear and simple lesson of 9/11: al-Qaeda is the enemy and we must defend ourselves against them. Everyone in America understands that except apparently the Republican Party. From NYC to Davenport, Iowa, to Helena, Montana: Americans understand who the enemy is. But the Republican Party does not.
While Bush continues to bog us down in Iraq and wants to put 6000 National Guardsmen on the Mexican border to defend against poor migrant workers, NYC is unprotected. NYC is a target and Bush refuses to help. He has NEVER even tried setting up a system of inspecting the cargo that comes into our port. He has privatized and outsourced our security and in the process has completely ignored some of the biggest threats to our city. Our port is unprotected and al-Qaeda knows it. Is Bush DARING them to attack NYC again?
But it gets even worse. The Department of Homeland Security, which already is failing to protect NYC, has basically given us a further slap in the face by cutting our security funding by $83 Million. NYC will be even less protected in the future. And
New York State is also taking a cut of almost $115 million, despite promises from Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff earlier this year that his department would be distributing money based on risk. NYC and NY State are being slapped in the face and abandoned. While New York is getting less, Bush has decided to increase funding for cities like Omaha, Nebraska, Louisville, Kentucky, and Jacksonville, Florida.
Mr. Bush: Why don't you just hang a giant "Bomb Me" sign on NYC and wait for the terrorists to attack?
I never bought into the conspiracy theories that Bush WANTED 9/11 to happen so he could have an excuse to do whatever he wants. I think he was insanely stupid and incompetent and ignored the warnings then was surprised when it bit him in the ass. Of course nearly 3000 Americans died because of that mistake. But I do not think Bush wanted it to happen. Gross negligence, not conspiracy. That has always been my view on 9/11.
But what about now? Every American citizen learned the lesson of 9/11: terrorists will get us unless we defend ourselves. But Bush is not defending us! Bush is practically inviting terrorists in while failing to fight them abroad. The terrorists have regrouped and Bush is letting our guard down further. It seems like Bush is hanging NYC and NY State out as bait and telling al-Qaeda to "bring it on."
Does Bush want us to be attacked again? Is that what is going on? He is doing everything he can to facilitate another attack. It becomes harder to believe it is just gross incompetence and conspiracy theories are starting to sound more plausible. Bush is abandoning the defense of America! He cares more about oil fields in Iraq than in the homes, ports and infrastructure of regular Americans. He cares about protecting no-bid contracts for Lockheed, Bechtel and Halliburton, but not about the safety of American families. Why?
Does Bush want us to be attacked again?
There has to be a backlash. Bush has abandoned NYC and NY State over and over again. We already paid the price for his neglect. How many times will we let the Republican Party screw us? NYC and NY State HAVE TO FIGHT BACK. We have to send the Republican Party a message that NY STATE is as American as Omaha or Jacksonville, and they neglect us and screw us at their peril. Forget messing with Texas. DON'T MESS WITH NEW YORK!
Mr. Bush. We got your backlash right here. It is time to sweep the Republicans out of Congress in NY State. This is a matter of life and death for New York, not to mention state pride. We are being dissed in favor of Omaha, Nebraska, for God's sake! Let's also get rid of these incompetent Chickenhawks and replaces them with people who KNOW the consequences of war: the Fighting Democrats. Again, this is a matter of state pride and the security of our homes and families. If we don't show the Republicans they can't keep screwing us over then we may find ourselves facing another 3000 of our friends and families dead because of Bush's stupidity. I, for one, refuse to sit back and let that happen. And while we're at it, isn't it about time we Impeach this incompetent, corrupt President who refuses to protect American citizens? New York says to Bush and the Halliburton Republicans: Screw You!
Catastrophes | Government | Politics | Terrorism | New York City
At least one Dem running
Dave Mejias has declared, so there is at least one candidate. You can go to my Act Blue Site and contribute to the NY-03 race and it will go to whoever wins the Dem primary. So far I think Mejias is the only Dem running.
NY-3, 24 and 29 look like our best shots right now, but honestly we could sweep if we got our act together. The abandonment of NY State by Homeland security, the Republican Culture of Corruption, and Bush's plummeting popularity all add up to our perfect chance here in NY State. One person donated $500 on my Act Blue site JUST FOR NY-13, which remains a long shot. I'd like to see some big money going into NY-3, 24 and 29 as well...and -19, 20 and 23 are also possible.
Tom Suozzi?
I keep on hearing these tantalizing rumors about him taking on King, but alas, they seem to be untrue. Shame, really, because Suozzi could pull it off.
It would be a better use of his time...
How does he compare with the already declared Dem?
I'd so love to see some of these seats taken away form the Greedy Old Party. Doing my best to get the "Sweep NY State" meme off the ground.
Bloomberg
You all know I generally can stand the Mayor, but I have to give credit where credit is due, he had the best response of all possible responses:
"When you stop a terrorist, they have a map of New York City in their pocket, They don't have a map of any of the other 46 or 45 places."
Exactly.
Yep
Bloomberg doesn't do NEARLY enough to stand up to the Bush folks on this kind of stuff. But, unlike the State and National Repubs, Bloomberg does want what is best, as he sees it, for NYC.
Was just attacked on another site for being pissed about this. The rest of the nation doesn't seem to have a clue just what a target NYC is. We have ALREADY been attacked twice and several other attempts have been thwarted. But everyone seems to be about, "well where's our fair share." In some ways they are right since Bush neglects ALL cities. But come on folks! NYC and DC really are the primary targets. Everyone else, important though they are, are secondary targets at best.

















Does Peter King have a Democratic opponent?
He's the freakin' head of the House Homeland Security Committee, and he let this happen?