The Death of the Eisenhower Republican

There was a time, barely remembered today, when the idea of bipartisanship really seemed reasonable. There was once a kind of Republican, now driven to the verge of extinction, called the "Eisenhower Republican." Today, the equivalent beast would be called a "Moderate Democrat." The Republican Party itself has largely purged itself of Eisenhower Republicans in its radical shift to the right.

I have always been a Democrat. But even the earliest President I remember, Richard Nixon, though a crazy, paranoid, power hungry SOB, could be ideologically reasonable, as evidenced by his establishment of the EPA. But Nixon, probably unintentionally, began the decline of the Eisenhower Republican. Some of those he brought into government are the very same "barking crazy rightwingers" who have systematically been destroying our nation under Bush. That, combined with Nixon's spectacular and televised downfall, discredited the reasonable, moderate Republican. The Democrats, then more liberal than now, were ready to take advantage of Nixon's downfall, and the far right wing Republicans, then marginalized but poised to strike, were ready to begin their plans to take over the nation through lying, stealing and cheating.

One man had a small chance of saving the Eisenhower Republican: President Gerald Ford.

Gerald Ford, the last of the Eisenhower Republicans who had any chance of saving the Republican Party from the barking crazy rightwingers, has died.

Gerald Ford had been a well-respected Congressman, someone who could work with both parties to get things done. As criminal charges consumed Nixon and his administration, Gerald Ford was the last chance Republicans had of restoring respectability. Centrist, traditionalist and all around nice guy, Ford might have been the only person who could have saved the Republican Party from being taken over by extremists or lapsing into obscurity.

Pardoning Nixon and the stagflation Ford inherited from Nixon pretty much made it impossible for Ford to succeed. In the end, a moderate Democrat (Jimmy Carter) defeated Ford for President, and the right wing fringe of the Republican Party swept in to destroy the Eisenhower Republicans and take over. Those right wing nutcases have not only gone to great lengths to destroy our Constitution and to run up the biggest budget deficits in hitsory, but have also by now alienated moderate Republicans. The death of the Eisenhower branch of the Republican Party was one reason why Democrats won this year.

And with the Republican Party now nearly completely dominated by anti-democracy, right wing fools, and with Democrats winning by appealing to American moderates, Gerald Ford, at the age of 93, has died.

America has always been and should remain a two-party system. Why? Because we, as a culture, divide pretty solidly into Federalist and State's Rights camps...strict interpretation vs. loose interpretation of the Constitution... These are very real ambiguities within our system, left ambiguous by those who formed our government, and it is the give and take between these two views of government that has made our nation strong. The big danger now is that one party, the Republicans, have been taken over by a group that believes in neither of these philosophies of government except as a way of fooling voters. Instead, the barking crazy rightwingers have, in essence, thrown the whole Constitutional dichotomy out the window and have tried instituting a one-party, Soviet system of crony capitalism, corruption and war profiteering.

I have always been a Democrat and almost certainly will remain a Democrat for life. Why? Because I like the fact that the Democratic Party represents America's diversity in almost every way and, by and large, is more representative of the average American than the more elitist, pro-wealthy Republican Party has been since Harding's time. You'd have to go back before Harding before I would consider the Republican Party more representative of my views than the Democratic Party.

But I respect a healthy, moderate Republican Party, the Eisenhower Republicans, to balance the two-party American system. That is why Ford's failure to hold the line against the right wing extremists within the Republican Party is a shame and why I am saddened by Ford's death.

Since Ford's presidency, the entire track of the Republican Party has been towards more and more extremism, more and more lies, more and more greed, and more and more corruption. Almost every traditional, Eisenhower Republican ideal has been thrown out by the barking crazy rightwingers, as the three largest deficits in our history came from Reagan, the elected Bush and the current little Bush and as the idea of "small government" has been thrown out the window in a greedy rush to publicly fund the corrupt military-industrial-religious extremist complex.

I can only hope that the Republican Party can rediscover its Gerald Ford/Dwight Eisenhower side and reject the extremists who currently control their Party.

mole333's picture

| | |

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
yero's picture

Ford vs. Brown

Okay, this is half off-topic, but it strikes me that James Brown is historically more important than Gerald Ford. Odd, isn't it? This is not a cricism of Ford, who was was probably the least evil Republican president for a long time. We remember the playwrights of ancient Greece than we do the kings....

mole333's picture

Thinking about it...

Well, we do remember several Greek playwrights, though maybe if you add Aggamemnon and Pericles we might be remembering some kings/rulers as well.

We mostly remember Roman emperors, not their poets, such as they were.

Shakepeare is probably better remembered than Elizabeth or Henry VII Tudors...but then again Henry VIII is well remembered because he slaughtered some wives.

Ford will be a footnote President. It is unavoidable when your Presidency was primarily marked by pardoning a criminal and stagflation (and the WIN buttons were an embarassment, not a way to get us out of stagflation). So you may well be right...in the end, James Brown may well be more historically important. But my point was that Ford was the END of something and the end is seldom remembered. Who, other than history nerds like me, remember that the last official Roman Emperor in the West was named Romulus Augustus? Who remembers the last person to leave a room. Ford was a breed of Republican that once was dominant AND a useful part of our nation's development coming out of WW II. But they have gone the way of Teddy Roosevelt Republicans: extinction. In both cases good Republican ideas were ultimately rejected by the Republican Party and adopted by the Democrats. Extinction is more significant that it gets credit for, sometimes.

Antid Oto's picture

You're letting Nixon off too easy

He made a deal with the devil, selling the the Republican Party to the far right wing of American politics in order to attract racist right-wing Democrats. Hunter S. Thompson saw this in 1972, as it was getting started:

At this point, it became almost unbearably clear to me that Richard Nixon had in fact sold the Republican Party down the tube in Miami. ... Given the safe assumption that the most important objective in Richard Nixon's life today is minimizing the risk of losing the 1972 election to George McGovern, simple logic decreed that he should bend all his energies to that end, at all costs.
...
It was no accident that the Nixon convention in Miami looked and sounded like a replay of the Goldwater convention back in San Francisco eight years ago. They even brought Goldwater back and treated him like a hero. His opening-night speech was a classic of vengeful ignorance, but the delegates loved it...His speech set the tone for the whole convention, and his only real competition was Ronald Reagan. Compared to those two, both Agnew and Nixon sounded like bleeding-heart liberals.

The next step, on Tuesday, was a public whipping for GOP "liberals" like Illinois Senator Charles Percy who wanted to change some of the delegate selection rules so the large industrial (and usually more liberal) states would have more of a voice in the 1976 convention. But his proposal lost by a landslide... (From "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72")

This is more or less why Reagan was almost able to beat Ford for the nomination in 1976, and easily beat then more moderate Poppy Bush in 1980. Ford didn't have a prayer of holding the line--Nixon changed the party's direction deliberately in 1968 and deepened that change in 1972. These things didn't happen by accident, and the Republican Party isn't going to recover from them anytime soon.

mole333's picture

True

I think Nixon did it cynically and with the full intention of "controlling" the extremists he was making a bargain with. Perhaps the elected Bush also thought he could control those forces. In the end they didn't or couldn't control them getting us into the crap we are in now.

I do let Nixon off a bit easy for the simple reason that what we have in the White House today is so odiously un-American, un-Constitutional and un-Patriotic not to mention extremist that I actually look back at Nixon with some nastolgia. I have never seen anything so disgusting as the pile of shit that has filled the White House these days. It makes everything that came before look bright and shiny in comparison.

Antid Oto's picture

I don't think Nixon cared about controlling them

At least not after he was done. He just wanted to win, and they served perfectly well for that purpose. What happened after that was Not His Problem.

Nixon was also not a whole lot better than this crowd on preserving the Constitution. He set Hoover loose on all manner of civil rights and peace groups, to the point of trying to provoke them into violence. The big difference there is that Bush has a servile Congress that will actually suspend habeas corpus for him, for example.

The one area I can easily think of where Nixon was significantly better than today's Republicans was the environment, which you mentioned. Apart from creating the EPA, his tenure also saw the passage of NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, and the original Clean Water Act.

mole333's picture

Diplomacy

It is a testament to how bad the current crowd is that I can say that Nixon out does them on foreign policy. Although Nixon and Kissenger committed some horrible atrocities in the name of "national security," they also understood the flip side of dimplomacy. Detente, opening China...these were things the current bunch of immature, greedy thugs could never even imagine, let alone accomplish.

sidnora's picture

"Nastolgia"

n., the realization that however nasty the past was, it was better than the present.

Sometimes typos are the best Freudian slips!

Not only was Nixon completely cynical in hopping into bed with the right, there was even a name for it, which I am surprised didn't surface in this conversation: the Southern Strategy, whereby the Republican Party opened its arms wide to all those Dixiecrats who felt sold out when Johson signed the Civil Rights Act into law. And they reside there still. There are days when I think that the (late and unlamented) Republican Congress and Bush Administration are just the latest battle of the Civil War, still being fought after 150 years.

What makes Nixon look good in comparison to the present, IMO, is that however evil he was, he wasn't delusional, at least until the end. Also there were plenty of people on both sides of the aisle who saw him for what he was and acted accordingly. After all, it would have taken some Republican votes to impeach him, and if they hadn't been there he wouldn't have resigned.

Bouldin's picture

Heh.

Very astute observation. Smiling


brought to you by


Current weather

NY - New York City, Central Park

day-clear
  • Clear sky
  • Temperature: 41 °F
  • Wind: Variable, 4.6 mph
  • Pressure: 30.23 inHg
  • Rel. Humidity: 38%
  • Visibility: 10 miles

Visit Our Sponsors

Premium Advertisers


Help Obama Win!

Upcoming events

  • no upcoming events available

Subscribe to our daily digest

In keeping with the "city that never sleeps" tradition, keep up to date with our daily syndication digest.



Powered by FeedBlitz


culturekitchen Media

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Fresh dissent served daily
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers Network
BlogSheroes

A new kind of voyeurism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] dailygotham [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.


Poll

We read

Only in New York

Jackson has a long history with one of Obama's chief rivals, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband former President Clinton. He counseled the two when the president's affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky became public.

But Jackson said his history with the Clintons doesn't complicate his decision to back his home state senator, calling Obama Illinois' "favorite son."

"It's not awkward at all," he said, adding, "I don't owe a debt to any of them."

How much does Al Sharpton owe?

— Jesse Jackson Rainbow Coalition

Who's online

There are currently 6 users and 1144 guests online.

Blogroll

Editors and Contributors

Mole's Progressive Democrat
Alien and Sedition
Dan Jacoby

The Indies

Adirondack Musings
The Albany Project
Angry Brown Butch
Atlantic Yards Report
Blue Spot
Buffalo Pundit
Buffalo Geek
Bike Blog
Brooklyn Rail
The Community Alliance
Danger Democrat
DDDB
DragonFlyEye
EverythingNY
Gowanus Lounge
Hell's Kitchen Online
Joshing Politics
Mamita Mala
Mamapalooza blog
More Gardens
Nassau GOP Watch
New York Games
No Land Grab
NY 13
On NY Turf
Peter King Watch
Politics on the Hudson
Open Orleans
Prometheus6
Room Eight
Steve Gilliard RIP
The Oil Drum
Troy Polloi
Rochester Turning
Simply Left Behind
Time's Up
The Working Families Party Man
Power from Truth by Chris Owens

The little big media

Capitol Confidential
Gotham Gazette
Daily Politics
Wonkster
New York Blade
NYC Bloggers
NYC Indymedia
The Politicker
EmpireZone
Power Plays
Spin Cycle

The big little media

Curbed
Gawker
Gothamist
The Politico
City Limits

Everybody Party! blogs

New Democratic Majority
Stonewall Democrats
Working Families Party's WFPBlog

The Brains

The Brennan Center
Reform NY
The Century Foundation
Center for American Progress
Drum Major Institute's DMIblog
edwize
TortDeform

The Movement

New Democratic Majority
Democracy for NYC
DL21C
Act Now
Capitol D Group
New York Democratic Lawyers Council

The Loyal Opposition

Alarming News
News Copy
Ragged Thots
Suitably Flip
Urban Elephants
Serf City

Fun Stuff

City Rag
Jossip
Overheard in New York
Cobalt 6

This list is a work in progress. Are there blogs you believe should be included (maybe your own)? Please leaves us a message through our contact page. Or drop us a line at :

editors(at)
dailygotham(dot)com


Progressive Districts

Progressive States

Alabama
Arizona
California Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Pacific Northwest
Sunbelt