ICE Chills Union Organizing at FreshDirect
Cross posted from DailyKos.
The U.S. has a long history of using its forces and laws to put down Labor. In the late 1800s Pinkerton agents, paid by the DOJ, became famous for infiltrating the Molly Maguires. In the early 1900s, state militias and local police were used to break strikes by breaking heads.
Today, the criminal immigrant isn't an Irish miner; it's a Mexican warehouse worker, meatpacker or hotel maid. And today's Pinkertons are ICE agents working outside their own rules and the rule of law to coddle exploiters and criminalize the exploited.
The latest incident is occurring in Long Island City, Queens, where the Teamsters of Local 805 are working to organize nearly 900 warehouse workers at a FreshDirect warehouse.
TAKE ACTION: Tell Fresh Direct to stop threatening its workers.
Strangely, the company wasn't worried about its workers' immigration status as long as the workers didn't complain about their $7.60 per hour wage and minimal benefits. Some of the immigrant employees had worked for the companay for as many as five years. But as soon as those same workers started signing Teamster cards over the summer, things heated up.
First, the company distributed anti-union fliers (pdf).
In August and September two pro-union workers were fired.
The Teamsters filed an NLRB complaint, held a rally outside the warehouse and soon thereafter filed for an NLRA election, which is to be held December 22-23.
So here comes ICE to FreshDirect's rescue.
On November 30, the company was notified that it would be undergoing an audit of its employment records. But the company waited until Sunday and Monday to tell the workers "that Immigration and Customs Enforcement planned to inspect the records of every employee and asked them to update their information and provide documents, like Social Security cards, to prove employment eligibility," the New York Times reports.
At least 40 warehouse workers who could not produce proof that they were authorized to work in the United States quit or were suspended.
The move by ICE is in direct opposition to an Oct. 10 injunction by U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer that blocked the Department of Homeland Security's plan to use Social Security "no-match" letters to target firms that hire illegal workers.
And it violates ICE operational guidelines to stay out of labor disputes.
OI 287.3a states:
Whenever information received from any source creates a suspicion that an INS enforcement action might involve the Service in a labor dispute, a reasonable attempt should be made by Service enforcement officers to determine whether a labor dispute is in progress.
... Generally there is no prohibition for enforcing the Immigration and Nationality Act, even when there may be a labor dispute in progress. However, where it appears that information may have been provided in order to interfere with or to retaliate against employees for exercising their rights, no action should be taken on this information without the review of the District Counsel and approval of the Assistant District Director for Investigations or an Assistant Chief Patrol Agent.
Now of course ICE and FreshDirect are both denying that FreshDirect brought this investigation upon itself. But come on. Either ICE can't use a search engine, which means it must be even more incompetent than FEMA, or it is willingly serving as FreshDirect's hired goons.
And this is far from an isolated incident. ICE was much more forceful when it rounded up nearly 1,300 Swift employees one year ago. They also arrested several Smithfield meatpackers in North Carolina. And the Woodfin Suites hotel in San Francisco used a no-match threat to stomp out a living wage fight there.
In each of these cases, the workers either lost their jobs or were arrested. Nothing happened to the employers, who under the law could face criminal prosecution or fines.
Instead, mothers and fathers of U.S.-born children are deported. Wives and husbands, sisters and brothers are arrested for doing nothing more than showing up to work.
The ICE web site describes its Workforce Enforcement Unit's mission as:
...Enforcement activities intended to mitigate the risk of terrorist attacks posed by unauthorized workers employed in secure areas of our nation's critical infrastructure. In order to fulfill this mission, ICE special agents apply risk assessment principles to their critical infrastructure and worksite enforcement cases in order to maximize the impact of our limited resources against the most significant threats and violators.
Though worksite enforcement efforts are focused on investigations related to critical infrastructure and national security, these efforts and resources are also extended to other places of employment. Unauthorized workers employed at sensitive sites and critical infrastructure facilities—such as airports, seaports, nuclear plants, chemical plants and defense facilities—pose serious homeland security threats.
I fail to see the threat posed by these warehouse workers.
There's no question that immigration is a difficult issue. The Teamsters certainly do not endorse unfettered hiring of undocumented workers. That drives wages down and continues this system of fear and intimidation.
Companies, like FreshDirect, that turn a blind eye to immigration status and hire desperate workers at depressed wages and then use threats of deportation to keep those workers in their place, are no better than the industrialists who throughout our history exploited the Irish, Italians, Slavs, Jews, Chinese and Blacks -- our grandmothers and grandfathers.
And as long as ICE and the Department of Homeland Security play along, they are no better than the head busting thugs who did their bidding.
The bottom line is all workers, regardless of their immigration status, should be free to exercise the basic human right to form a union.
To add insult to injury, the latest word from New York is that Fresh Direct is holding the workers' final paychecks hostage. When some workers called up to inquire about their checks, they were told they had to come down to the office and sign for them personally. "But," the voice on the phone told them, "Immigration is here."
WTFIYP? | FreshDirect | Immigrants | Unions | Teamsters
There is a definite pattern
As I point out, there is a definite pattern evolving here between ICE "enforcement" actions and union/worker organizing efforts.
Did the CEO of FreshDirect get on the phone to ICE and say "hey come down here, we have a lot of undocumented immigrants who are trying to start a union?" Probably not. But the company has hired a union-busting law firm, which probably knows how to manipulate the law (or break it -- as many union busting firms do) to get the results its client wants.
When it comes to fighting workers, dirty tricks, anonymous tips and use of official police action have a long history.
If the workers at FreshDirect weren't too afraid of being separated from their families just before the holidays, or if they could afford lawyers and private investigators, maybe they could find out who called who when.
But the fact remains that ICE should not be interfering in a labor dispute. And too often, suspiciously so, it does.
There is a definite pattern
As I point out, there is a definite pattern evolving here between ICE "enforcement" actions and union/worker organizing efforts.
Did the CEO of FreshDirect get on the phone to ICE and say "hey come down here, we have a lot of undocumented immigrants who are trying to start a union?" Probably not. But the company has hired a union-busting law firm, which probably knows how to manipulate the law (or break it -- as many union busting firms do) to get the results its client wants.
When it comes to fighting workers, dirty tricks, anonymous tips and use of official police action have a long history.
If the workers at FreshDirect weren't too afraid of being separated from their families just before the holidays, or if they could afford lawyers and private investigators, maybe they could find out who called who when.
But the fact remains that ICE should not be interfering in a labor dispute. And too often, suspiciously so, it does.

Are you Serious?
Does anyone that read this seriously believe that a teamster post is accurate? First of all - the ICE doesn't post or publicly state the date that letters are sent to companies for audits - how does this teamster post know this unless they have inside info?
Second - what good would it do for a company to risk losing millions of dollars in business for a union vote? I know unions think they are still important for America - but seriously - why would a company fire its workforce, only to know that the unions would try again in one year. It doesn't make sense - you don't trade profits for union victories. No company ever has.
And Third, this post seems like something straight out of a teamseters PR company letter. Too much legal text fora sane person to write on their own. Are the teamseters even ashamed that they can on hand tout immigrant rights and on another tout keeping jobs in america for legal workers? Seriously - the double talk is despictable.
Anonymous ... company flack?
The company sent memos to all the workers. We have lawyers too, so, yes we asked about the audit notification the company received. What, don't you think we talk to each other?
What does the company lose? It loses a few employees that it could replace at low wages -- as long as the union stays out. If we organize, the workers will receive a higher wage, better benefits, a grievance system. And the company loses its dictatorial grip on a class of worker that it has used threats and intimidation to keep in its place.
The managers lose control. And that scares them more than losing a few grand.
Look around. Companies do it all the time. They would rather spend a fortune on union busting law firms, produce stupid videos and risk (a nonexistent risk, really) breaking the law to keep unions out. That saves the managers money over the long run because they can continue to screw the workers and pocket the profits.
The courts, for example, may side with the workers who were fired and get them their jobs back with a few thousand dollars in back pay, but it may take seven to ten years. And in the meantime, the remaining workers see what standing up for yourself gets you.
Again, no company has been fined or charged for employing undocumented workers. Why should FreshDirect expect to be the first?
Open your eyes. The laws only work for those who have the most money.
But when you're in the Teamsters, you have 1.4 million members backing you up. Yes, even a few who can use big f***ing words, learnt computers and read books.
Immigrant rights and jobs in America is also a false dichotomy (oooh another big word). Stopping illegal immigration is a national imperative. Free-flowing immigration and guest worker programs would only continue to undercut living wages and better benefits for everyone. But you have to look at the bigger picture: Why are they coming here? Because US trade policies like NAFTA, CAFTA and the Peru FTA are destroying their economies.
They're not coming here for our sitcoms and blue jeans. They're coming here because their families are starving.
And believing that you could identify and roundup 12 million people is pure fantasy. So the best way to raise conditions for all workers is to ensure that US labor laws are equally applied. And in most cases that means a union.
Dear Gothanonymous
The Teamsters is a huge union. It has represented many people, especially truck drivers, vigorously. As a result, many people represented by the IBT have better conditions than non-union workers.
Employers often hire illegal, undocumented workers: they end up paying them lower wages and providing worse benefits. This happens in delivery operations like fresh direct, construction, food processing. Undocumented workers are even harder to organize into unions than workers who are in the US lawfully. Many unions -- the IBT included -- have decided that the only way to bring up industry wages is to sign up all workers. This is a risky strategy since many people wish the undocumented would simply disappear (and thus end a real and harsh wage competition.). I think the Teamsters are on the right track with that strategy, but it's very hard row to hoe.
For me, the question is: can we help bring better wages and conditions to Fresh Direct drivers (documented or not)? The issue of an overall national resolution of immigration policy will not be resolved anytime soon, given Congressional deadlocks. But better wages for these employees can be achieved here and now.
All this is not to say that the Teamsters -- like many other US institutions are perfect. They've had misleaders and crooks just as have the GOP & the Democrats. Union democracy and honesty are as fragile as political democracy and honesty.
Unionizing and illegal immigrants
There may be some interesting dilemmas here. It seems to me that unions don't want illegal immigrants taking jobs that they could do, both because it means a loss of jobs for union members and because it lowers wages and benefits.
On the other hand...
Once a union gets into a particular industry or company, say the Fresh Direct delivery business, then it's up to the union to make sure that its members are here legally. They can no longer blame management. And unions may not want the burden of checking backgrounds and paperwork on all those people; they'd rather force management to do that work.
That may be an oversimplification, and I'm interested in hearing other points of view.
















The suggestion that Fresh Direct caused the ICE enforcement
is not shown. To my mind, care should be used so as to not make suggestions for which factual underpinnings are missing.
As I understand it, no one has shown facts indicating that Fresh Direct instigated the ICE action. It could be true, but we do not know it. We should save alarming suggestions like the one made here for when we can support it.