Search
Finally, a GOOD Primary Election Night! Brooklyn Edition
Over the years I have cataloged the decline and then recovery of corrupt Party Boss Vito Lopez. His big ticket judicial candidates (e.g. both Surrogate Judge positions) lost to candidates backed by the reform movement that seeks to be Vito's nemesis, though probably is usually more of a nuisance to Vito because it serves as its own nemesis. Vito's prominent judicial race losses seemed to signify a decline in his fortunes. That decline seemed halted last year when self-nemesising reformers basically handed Vito one of their city council seats right in the heart of reform territory. Vito's boy Steve Levin seemed to lead a Vito comeback. Of course behind the smiles at Levin's win for the corrupt side was Vito's big loss when he tried to take out former ally turned independent-minded woman Diana Reyna. He lost that one and I bet it still rankles. His hatred for his former ally was so great he even endorsed the WFP candidate over the Democratic candidate (Reyna) even though he is SUPPOSED to be the Democratic Party leader. His hatred for Reyna was even so great he began to threaten other allies who didn't follow his lead against Reyna (like Lew Fidler) with challenges. So even amid victory Vito was suffering defeat. And it is a sign of his perhaps slipping grip that his threats to allies who still supported Reyna were laughed off.
This year Vito tried to follow up on his Levin win. Among the very, very few District Leaders/State Committeemen who actually stood up to Vito were Jo Anne Simon and Alan Fleishman, whose district overlaps with the City Council district that Vito just won for his boy Levin. So he went gunning for Simon and Fleishman. Sadly, Fleishman, who had been rumbling about retiring for some years, didn't have the heart for a fight so bowed out. Pity. He would have won easily, I believe. But reformer Chris Owens and unwitting or witting tool of the Vito Lopez wannabe Buddy Scotto (he likes to run his club with tactics akin to Vito's) Jesse Strauss played the self-nemesis reformer roles and BOTH stepped up to challenge Vito Lopez's choice Williamson (keep forgetting his first name...it's Steve, but why bother remembering...he lost). Jo Anne Simon also was suffering from the reformer's self-nemesis syndrome in a different way. She had sided with Buddy Scotto in an internal fight and alienated a good number of those who supported her City Council bid. She was the only reformer who was going up against Vito's Hope, so perhaps she realized most people would vote for her anyway, but it reduced the enthusiasm. Furthermore, her insistence of not being associated with Chris Owens (who won last night) meant many who supported Chris Owens felt unable to campaign for Jo Anne Simon.
All in all, I was sure that the reformers had killed themselves again and Vito was poised to continue his rollover in my neighborhood.
Chris Owens TROUNCED both Jesse Strauss and What'shisname Williamson. So Scotto and Vito both took a big hit yesterday. Congratulations Chris. Chris ran a low key, low budget campaign. He got the diverse endorsements of Gatemouth (often my personal nemesis and sometime Vito apologist, or so it has seemed), Rock Hackshaw and myself. A trio that should represent broad support but last time we all agreed it didn't work out so well (Josh Skaller for City Council).
Jo Anne Simon won, but in a much closer race than it should have been. Congratulations Jo Anne. I greatly respect and like Jo Anne Simon. But her alienating of the more progressive of the reformers for no good reason other than to please the ego of Buddy Scotto (whose sole political agenda seems to be controlling IND with an iron fist and not cleaning up the Gowanus Canal). Joan Millman (see below) and Jo Anne Simon went out on limbs for Scotto to support John Heyer for City Council last year and Jesse Strauss this year, toeing a line Buddy Scotto drew for them. In doing so they betrayed one past IND president and scapegoated the then-current president for the club divisions they themselves created. Jo Anne Simon deserved to win both the City Council seat and her current position. But her toeing Buddy Scotto's line was a factor in losing the former and it made the latter much closer than it should have been. Jo Anne...you are better than Buddy. Make him toe the line rather than the other way around. You will do better.
I suspect we will see more of Hope Reichbach. She ran a very good campaign despite her supposed lack of enthusiasm for running for the position. She supposedly was merely doing Vito Lopez a favor and didn't really want it. But she ran enthusiastically and could well have won it. Had another reformer stepped forward as many did in last year's city council race, Jo Anne would have been toast and Vito would have won another one. Fortunately, the reformers held ranks and Jo Anne won over Vito's Hope.
I have my doubts that outside of very insider circles we will see much more of Williamson or Strauss. Both will probably try for things, but neither really impressed people much or ran very good campaigns. Perhaps they will learn some lessons and do better next time (after all, Barack Obama went from lousy campaigner to great orator on his own initiative). But I doubt it.
Joan Millman had a challenger this year too. But it wasn't a Vito Lopez backed challenger. In fact, it was Doug Biviano, a candidate whose campaign manager is one of Vito Lopez's most avid enemies. Last year I was highly critical of Biviano for coming into the City Council race against Jo Anne Simon and basically pulling a lot of shit out of his ass, lecturing the reform movement on reform as if he was the expert and the rest of us newcomers. He came off like an asshole and alienated many who initially liked his message. Had he stuck with his message and not campaigned mainly by trying to disparage (often based on bullshit) not even the Vito Lopez candidate so much as the front runner reformer, he wouldn't have made so many enemies. And in this year of Jo Anne Simon and Joan Millman alienating so many progressive reformers, he might even have picked up the endorsement of a club like CBID or NKD. But even if many of us were angry at Jo Anne and Joan for their toeing the Scotto line, very few people were willing to back someone as obnoxious and crazy seeming as Biviano. But let me give some credit here to Biviano and Gary Tilzer: they did far better than I expected against Joan...and far better than they should have. Biviano got almost 27% of the vote. I predicted he wouldn't break 20% and thought I was being generous. But he beat my expectations and deserves credit for it. Biviano worked his ass off for that 27%, though he also was helped by the fact that Joan, like Jo Anne, threw so many supporters under the bus to feed the ego of Buddy Scotto. Now I greatly respect and like Joan Millman. But Joan: you are MUCH better than Buddy and would have done even better than you did had you not pushed so many supporters away and scapegoated Lowey for the divisions the Scottos caused. Joan Millman, even more than Jo Anne Simon, should be making Buddy Scotto toe the line rather than the other way around. Joan earned herself a challenge from the left over the past 2 years. I am glad she won, but she is lucky that she only had Biviano to beat. I wonder if Biviano's relatively good showing will encourage others, perhaps more savvy and better funded to try next time. I suggest mending some fences, Joan.
The last race in my neighborhood was also good news. Velmanette Montgomery, my State Senator, soundly trounced the Hedge Fund Shill Pollard despite the tons of money Hedge Fund execs poured into the race. Velmanette Montgomery is one of the best State Senators in the state, and though that may be damning with faint praise, she is good by any standards. The bills she sponsors are excellent and her voting record is pretty much 100%. Integrity won out over greed in this race.
One thing I should note is that this was, in addition to being a beating for Vito Lopez, was a big win for the Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats. Most of their endorsed candidates who had ANY chance of winning actually won.
I should also note that brawling jerk Kevin Parker (I'm ready to duck now) won over Wellington Sharpe. I have met Sharpe several times and like him. Pity he didn't have what it took to take out the bad boy of Brooklyn politics, Kevin "Hothead" Parker.




Re: Finally, a GOOD Primary Election Night! Brooklyn Edition
Class up Michelson. Chris and I both ran a clean campaign did not attack or disparage each other, and we expected the same from our supporters. Every other Owens supporter I met was very gracious and acknowledged that although they supported Chris, I would have been a fine choice. And my people said the same about Chris. Why you insist on being nasty, and assuring fissures in the reform community that do not otherwise need to exist, is a mystery to those of us working hard to keep the 52nd a bastion of the reform movement.
Congrats to Chris and I look forward to working him as the new District Leader.
Re: Finally, a GOOD Primary Election Night! Brooklyn Edition
Ah, Jesse Jesse Jesse,
You forget I was privy to the inside workings of IND over the past couple of years and saw those who enabled Scotto's power play and the scapegoating of Kenn Lowy. I remember you standing up in favor of Scotto on that one. I did not create those fissures, nor did Kenn Lowy. It was the Scottos that did so and you participated in the scapegoating that covered Scotto's ass. Now you are accusing me of creating the fissures? This is becoming a pattern with you. Blame others for the fissures created by the inner circle at IND.
Now at no time did I say you would not make a good, or at least adequate, district leader. In that you are mistaking me for Gatemouth who slammed you as ignorant of even the basic workings of the system and therefore unqualified for the job. By comparison to Gatemouth I basically endorsed Chris and left you to your own devices other than comparing you with the other newcomer who seemed to think he knew more about reform than those who had been reformers for years, Doug Biviano. And I believe you came off the better in the comparison.
So Scotto created the fissures you speak of and Gatemouth was the one who attacked you as not qualified. Yet you scapegoat me? Wise up Jesse. Some of us have been watching these dynamics for many more years than you have.
Re: Finally, a GOOD Primary Election Night! Brooklyn Edition
Spot-on analysis, thanks. Dare we hope that the end of the Vito Lopez regime may be in sight?
This was a very good night for the reform movement in Brooklyn (and it will be even better if Restler pulls off a victory). Let's hope for a closing of the ranks and a recognition of who the real enemy is; hint: not each other.